Showing posts with label Citi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Citi. Show all posts

More and more glitches from automated trading

Here's another incident from automated trading - this time is from Citigroup. 

Full article here: Citigroup Slams Nasdaq's Facebook Compensation Plan 


Citigroup slammed Nasdaq OMX Group's plan to compensate firms harmed byFacebook's botched market debut to the tune of $62 million, saying in a regulatory filing the exchange should be liable for hundreds of millions more, according to a letter seen by Reuters.
Citigroup Building
Getty Images

Citi [C  30.31    -0.18  (-0.59%)   ] said Nasdaq's[NDAQ.O  23.02    -0.17  (-0.73%)   ] actions in the May 18 initial public offering amounted to "gross negligence," in the letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which had not yet been made public.    
Citi's market-making arm, Automated Trading Desk, lost around $20 million in the May 18 IPO, a source told Reuters in May. That is just a sliver of the upwards of $500 million that market-making firms - which facilitate trades, backing them with their own capital - and brokers lost in the $16 billion IPO.    
Liabilities at U.S. exchanges, which have some regulatory duties, are capped in most instances. Nasdaq's cap in most instances is $3 million a month.    

How Citigroup, CEO Pandit Turned Themselves Around

Published: Friday, 12 Mar 2010 | 3:07 PM ET

By: Jeff Cox
CNBC.com

Just a year after being relegated to the pile of near-dead banks crushed by the credit crisis, Citigroup is back.

Investors both big and small have been taking massive stakes of Citi's shares that at this time in 2009 were teetering around the $1 mark.

Vikram Pandit
AP
Vikram Pandit

The venture to the brink of penny-stock territory was a torturous one, but that all seems to have changed as Citi's top officials are assuring investors that a return to profitability is on the horizon.

The company's return from its seemingly destined march to the graveyard has coincided with the rising star of embattered CEO Vikram Pandit.

"For the most part, Citi's done a good job of improving its balance sheet and its capital position," said David Konrad, banking analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. "It's going to be a long, long road there, but he's actually got a little bit of momentum on his side now."

Full article here

Lost Citi Begins to Find Its Way Back Home

Citigroup shares are up more than 70% in the past four weeks. That isn't a typo. More to the point, the market isn't making a mistake.

For months, Citi lagged behind as shares in other troubled banks took off. The wariness made sense. Throughout the credit crunch, Citi's balance sheet has had a habit of springing nasty surprises. The added fear: As part of a preferred-for-common stock exchange, the government is taking a 34% voting stake in the bank, which investors feared could lead to disruptive interventions.

Ironically, it is the exchange that made Citi a buy. In short, it solved the bank's chief weakness, a dearth of tangible common equity. Banks lacking TCE are risky stock investments because shareholders stand to be diluted by the capital raises needed to boost equity.

At the end of June, the bank had just under $40 billion of TCE, hardly a sufficient buffer to support $1.8 trillion of tangible assets in a tough economy. After the exchange, the estimated proceeds from two deals, as well as the expected hit from bringing assets onto its balance sheet, Citi would have just over $100 billion of TCE. That would be equivalent to about 5.1% of tangible assets -- high for a big bank.

And the higher TCE ratio helps with Citi's other big weakness. The bank has to deal with a large amount of long-term debt coming due, $112 billion from 2010 through 2012.

It is unlikely Citi could have accessed debt markets in the size it did this year without issuing through a government-guaranteed program. That goes away in October. True, the government always can bring it back if needed. But if that were to happen just for Citi, the bank might strengthen its reputation as the sector's problem child.

That now looks less likely. The stronger TCE buffer affords creditors more protection. And if Citi's balance sheet shrinks as planned, it likely won't need to issue the full $112 billion to pay down maturities.

Skeptics note that Citi's TCE total reflects a $42 billion net deferred-tax asset. This balance-sheet item can have value because it can be used to lower income taxes. But the bank needs to make money to use it. And companies have to haircut this asset if profitability takes longer than expected to return.

While that is a risk, Citi has assets it could sell to generate a profit specifically aimed at retaining the value of the deferred-tax asset.

Meanwhile, political fears seem overdone. Despite sitting on a $10 billion paper profit, the government isn't likely to sell out soon, as the stake gives it useful leverage if Citi's management slips. And, so far, pressure from the government and regulators actually may have helped drive Citi forward in certain areas, particularly corporate governance.

Losses will, of course, weigh on Citi. The government's stress tests estimated worst-case losses of $105 billion this year and next, almost equal to the new TCE total. But Citi's loan-loss reserve, which absorbs losses before they hit TCE, is now $37 billion. At 5.6% of loans, it is substantially higher than for most rivals. Citi should also generate pre-provision earnings over the period.

Perhaps the rally hasn't priced all of this in. Citi trades at about one times its estimated new TCE per share versus about 1.55 times for Bank of America, adjusted for recent transactions. It mightn't get there if earnings or the economy disappoints. But if Citi performs, the problem child could continue winning over those who shunned it.

2-Star Stocks Poised to Plunge: Citigroup?

Based on the aggregated intelligence of 135,000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's free investing community, banking behemoth Citigroup (NYSE: C) has received a distressing two-star ranking.

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at Citigroup's business and see what CAPS investors are saying about the stock right now.

Citigroup facts

Headquarters (founded)

New York, N.Y. (1812)

Market Cap

$43.6 billion

Industry

Financial Services

TTM Revenue

$34.69 billion

Management

CEO Vikram Pandit

President William McNamee

TTM Return on Equity

(12.7%)

5-Month Return

267%

Competitors

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC)

Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC)

CAPS members bearish on C also bearish on

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM)

Ford Motor (NYSE: F)

CAPS members bullish on C also bullish on

General Electric (NYSE: GE)

Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL)

Sources: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and Motley Fool CAPS. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Over on CAPS, fully 1,698 of the 8,338 members who have rated Citigroup -- some 20% -- believe the stock will underperform the S&P 500 going forward. These bears include bankerman13 and EmmaBem.

Last month, bankerman13 tapped Citigroup as a zombie that needs to be slayed:

This bank is running on government batteries. It won't show a profit for several years to amount to anything. ... Another GM and it keeps all the other banks from showing the improvement they deserve. Break it up. It's worth more that way than being a socialistic run bank.

In a more recent pitch, EmmaBem singled out the stock as a relatively unattractive banking option:

I really want to like Citi, it is so cheap and with the performance of the other banks, I have to think Citi will become a profitable giant once again. But then, I say to myself, why gamble on Citi when you can invest in Bank of America or Wells Fargo, both are still cheap and promise much less government intervention and much more profit. Citi may end up above $5 by the end of the year, but, for my money, [Bank of America] or [Wells Fargo] are a safer and equally profitable investment.

What do you think about Citigroup, or any other stock for that matter?

I finally graduated!

My results are out and it has been confirmed! I finally completed my studies!

The first goal for this year has been achieved, and now for the second goal at the end of the year. Equities are still quite beaten down, and Celestial has been the hot topic of the week, especially when Friday is coming near. Will they survive this through rights issuance or will the bond holders decide to hold it till 2011? It has become so speculative that trading up and down is in at least 10-20%.

Other news to take note of:

Citi and U.S. finalize deal - $58B stock swap

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Citigroup Inc. on Wednesday began a long-delayed $58 billion stock swap that could leave the government with a 34% stake in the nation's third-largest bank.

Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) plans to swap common stock for as much as $33 billion of preferred shares, and convert as much as $25 billion of preferred shares held by the U.S. Treasury into common stock.

Citigroup said the swap could make it one of the world's best-capitalized banks, adding up to $61 billion of tangible common equity and $64 billion of Tier-1 common equity. It had planned to begin the swap in April.

The exchange offer could result in the issuance of more than 17 billion new common shares, diluting the holdings of existing investors by 76%. The public exchange offers expire July 24.

Link: http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/10/news/companies/citigroup_stock_swap.reut/index.htm?postversion=2009061008

End of an era

I guess you can see this all over the news, GM has finally declared bankruptcy after struggling for so long. Since January, it has asked for funds from government to keep it alive until March and still in the end, it didn't really helped much in its survival.

However, the markets didn't react badly to this news and in fact, the rally came once again. The other big news is with Citi and GM, being kicked out of the Dow composite.

General Motors and Citigroup were kicked out of the closely watched Dow Jones industrial average Monday, marking a historic fall from grace for two once venerable American corporations.

In a widely anticipated move, Dow Jones & Co said technology bellwether Cisco Systems Inc will replace GM, which filed for bankruptcy Monday morning. Travelers Co , a large home, auto and commercial insurer, will take the place of Citigroup due to the bank's restructuring and the government's "large and ongoing stake."

Sadly, Citi and AIG might be the next in line for the world to see how they tear down their walls and furniture to keep themselves afloat?

Citi may need $10 billion more - report

Wall Street Journal reports that Citigroup may need an additional $10 billion to meet the government's capitalization requirements.

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Citigroup Inc. may need to generate up to $10 billion in new capital to meet the requirements of the U.S. government's stress tests, the Wall Street Journal reported on its Web site Friday.

Like other financial institutions, the bank is in talks with the Federal Reserve about whether it needs more capital.

Citigroup may need less if regulators accept its arguments about its financial health. In a best-case scenario, Citigroup could have a roughly $500 million cushion above what the government requires, the paper reported, citing unnamed sources.

Calls to Citigroup were not immediately returned. A spokesman for the U.S. Treasury had no comment.

The government created the stress tests as a way to measure the capital needs of the nation's 19 largest banks and their ability to withstand a variety of economic scenarios.

According to a government source, the results are expected to be released to banks on Tuesday and publicly on Thursday.

Analysts believe the government will say all 19 banks are solvent, but that some will need to drum up more capital than others to cushion themselves as the U.S. recession deepens.

The results are expected to show that the banks must raise about $150 billion or more in fresh capital, a scenario that is likely to test the stocks of the neediest banks next week.

Citi seeking OK to award bonuses - report


LONDON (CNNMoney.com) -- Citigroup is seeking U.S. government approval to award special bonuses to several of its key employees, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The bank wants to use the bonuses to retain staff and raise morale among employees, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter.

The report said that Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) CEO Vikram Pandit pushed for stock-based bonuses at a meeting with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner earlier this month.

Taxpayers have lashed out at bonuses paid out to employees of bailed out financial institutions. Bonuses at American International Group (AIG, Fortune 500) and Merrill Lynch (MER) incited rage and created a storm in Washington.

Citi shareholders fume at annual meeting

Despite all gloomy and not-so-positive news, Citigroup manage to get a 10% jump from its trading yesterday. Overhaul of the board of directors is the 1st step, I believe there's more to come moving forward in the company's strategic direction and what doesn't kill you, just simply makes you stronger in the future.

---------

But key initiatives, including plans to oust long-standing Citigroup directors, fall flat.


By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer

Be Wary of Risk Assets and Citi's 'Profit'

Quite a number of articles on Citi, and this may be quite insightful for investors who are thinking of investing in Citi for a long term period. Looking at the credit swaps of Citi compared to others, it still looms some slight worry.

------------------

Author:
Chris Ciovacco
Date: April 19, 2009

Before we get into the NASDAQ (QQQQ) recent new high and our possible approach to the markets, let's shed some light on Citigroup's earnings. Citigroup posted a $1.6 billion "profit" this morning, after a $2.5 billion "gain" because their bonds are worth less in the open market (you read that right, worth less). Note the use of the word "possibility" in the Bloomberg story:

Citigroup posted a $2.5 billion gain because of an accounting change adopted in 2007. Under the rule, companies are allowed to record any declines in the market value of their own debt as an unrealized gain. The rule reflects the possibility that a company could buy back its own debt at a discount, which under traditional accounting methods would result in a profit.

The bank still faces speculation about its survival prospects, as reflected in the elevated prices for its credit- default swaps, a type of instrument that investors use to insure against a debt default. Citigroup’s credit-default swaps as of yesterday were trading at 557, up from 193 at the end of last year. By comparison, rival New York-based bank JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s swaps are trading at 174. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s swaps were at 322 a week before the U.S. securities firm filed for bankruptcy last September.

When a credit default swap moves from 193 to 557 (188% gain), it shows the market thinks the chance of Citigroup defaulting has increased quite substantially since January 1, 2009.

Our Approach To Current Bullish Conditions: This detailed article acknowledges the possibility of a bottoming process in some risk assets and stresses the need for patience.

This old Bloomberg article sites research that found "retests of bear market lows occur 86% of the time", which clearly supports remaining patient.

No party for Citi's owners: You and me

The bank is back in black, but common shareholders - a group soon to include Joe Taxpayer - get stuck with the costs of the past year's restructuring.

By Colin Barr, senior writer

ANALYSIS-Can Citigroup's results be sustained?

Citi delivers profit surprise -- kind of

The troubled banking giant earned $1.6 billion in the first quarter, but still reported a per share loss due to an accounting change. Stock jumps ahead of bell.

By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer

Link: http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/17/news/companies/citigroup/index.htm?postversion=2009041707

Citigroup tries to stop the bleeding

Another loss may be unavoidable for the banking giant this quarter, even as peers shine. But investors may take comfort that the worst may soon be over.

By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer

Link: http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/15/news/companies/citigroup_quarter/index.htm?postversion=2009041515

Citigroup's Place on a Roll of Shame

Eleven years ago this week, banking mogul Sandy Weill took a victory lap at the Masters Tournament. Today his creation is on a government list of losers.

By Carol J. Loomis, senior editor at large

Link: http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/10/news/citigroup_loomis.fortune/index.htm

Don't Fall for Citigroup's Fantasy

Overdue, but never late than never. Interesting news on Citi, when I was doing my reservist.

---------------------------

Markets exploded today because of a memo from Citigroup (NYSE: C) CEO Vikram Pandit, telling employees that -- surprise! -- the bank was actually on track to post its best quarter in over a year ... and a profit! Maybe things aren't as bad as we thought! We're saved! We're saved! Whoo-hoo!

Not so fast
You can't blame the market's reaction. Since Feb. 6, the Dow Jones has risen all of five times. Even relatively healthy banks like JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) are being treated like basket cases. Anything that can be slightly spun as good news is bound to be clinged to. Just give us any good news -- even if it's not, you know, true -- and the market will run with it.

This is no exception. Citigroup's announcement that "Hey, hey, we're actually profitable!" is twisted, tortured, and largely irrelevant to its ultimate fate.

The gist of Pandit's memo was that operating profit was going gangbusters -- as if operating profit has been the problem all along. The problem is not a bank's ability to generate current income, but its ability to absorb losses on legacy assets that are worth a fraction of their purchase price -- using absurd amounts of leverage to boot.

The memo disclosed numbers that point to an operating profit of about $8.3 billion this quarter, but Pandit didn't give any mention of what asset writedowns would be. "In January and February alone, our revenues excluding externally disclosed marks were $19 billion," he said. Great! Now... uh... about those "externally disclosed marks?" How are those workin' out for you?

I'm not worried that Citigroup can't generate operating profit: I'm worried it's not solvent. There's a big difference. Imagine a person drowning in debt but insisting they're wealthy because their paycheck exceeded their grocery bills. You get the idea.

Same game, different day
You can't blame bank CEOs for trying to instill confidence these days. Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) tried a similar approach a few weeks ago, telling investors that Countrywide and Merrill Lynch were the "stars" of 2009, and that Merrill Lynch will be "a thing of beauty," pointing to, you guessed it, operating profits.

It doesn't take a tremendous amount of thought to see that if a company has an operating profit of X and losses on existing assets of X times 100, things might not turn out so hot. Such is the case with Merrill Lynch, whose losses in 2007 and 2008 wiped out all profits earned over the preceding eleven years, and ultimately caused B of A to become the recipient of one of the largest federal bailouts ever. "A thing of beauty" indeed.

Posting the occasional operating profit will indeed provide a cushion for banks to absorb impending writedowns, but it's a clown show to think it'll be enough to plug the black hole of losses, especially in Citigroup's case.

Link: http://www.fool.com/investing/dividends-income/2009/03/10/dont-fall-for-citigroups-fantasy.aspx

Citigroup seeks reverse stock split

Measure expected to help offset the massive conversion of government's preferred stock into common shares.

By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer

citigroup.gif

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Citigroup unveiled plans Thursday to pursue a reverse stock split, and the company officially gave notice of its previously announced plans to convert the government's massive preferred share stake into common stock.

The New York City-based bank said it would authorize its board of directors to carry out the reverse split, but it requires a shareholder vote before it can take effect.

The move would help reduce the number of shares outstanding for Citi, which are expected to swell after the Treasury Department completes its conversion of part of its $45 billion stake in the company. The bank currently has a total of 5.5 billion shares outstanding.

Shares of Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), initially surged on the news, climbing nearly 23% in Thursday morning trading. But the stock lost ground as the day wore on and wound up finishing Thursday down nearly 16%.

Late last month, the government said it would convert up to $25 billion of preferred shares, matching dollars that Citigroup is able to bring in from other investors. Approximately $52.5 billion in preferred stock will be converted as part of the agreement. This could leave the government with as much as a 36% stake in the bank.

Regulators announced the move to help boost Citi's tangible common equity, a closely watched measure of a bank's ability to absorb losses. The agreement is expected to increase it from the fourth-quarter level of $29.7 billion to as much as $81 billion.

The reverse stock split would also bolster Citi's lagging stock price, which fell below $1 earlier this month and closed on Wednesday at $3.08.

Many large investors, such as mutual funds and pension funds, tend to shun stocks trading below $5 a share. Some are even prohibited from investing in stocks trading below that level.

When a company completes a reverse split, it lowers the number of total shares outstanding and the stock price rises as a result. But the value of the company is unchanged.

For example, if a company has 100 million shares outstanding and a stock price of $5 and decides to split its shares at a 1 for 5 ratio, it would then have 20 million shares that trade at a price of $25.

In a regulatory filing, Citi proposed seven different possible ratios that it could use to split the stock.

Bad bets on the U.S. housing market and a deteriorating global economy has made Citigroup one of the hardest hit companies in the ongoing financial crisis.

The government has had to step in three times to help prop up Citigroup, but has stopped short of seizing complete control of, or nationalizing, the company.

Citi is not the first financial institution that has gotten extensive government aid to consider a reverse stock split. Mortgage buyer Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500), which was seized by the government last fall, announced in late November that it may undertake a reverse stock split in order to lift its ailing stock price.

Citigroup shares, which are off sharply from where they were just a year ago, have gained 63% over the past two weeks as investor fears about the underlying health of the firm have subsided.

Link: http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/19/news/companies/citigroup/index.htm

Through this, Citi can actually attract fund managers to invest in the company as there is this rule where large fund managers do not consider stocks that are below $5. One thing I worry on this is, currently it is priced in the $2 - $2.6 range, last closed $2.62 and through a reverse stock split, it will probably re-consolidate its share price to about $20+ I believe. This may also attract shortists to this stock, as there is now more meat to short this counter if more bad news occur as compared to this price range at the moment.

Citi spilts into 2: Citicorp and Citi holdings

The 4th quarter loss came as 1 big news and Citi decides to spilt its assets into 2.



<http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/16/news/companies/loomis_citi.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009011616>

With this spilt, it's clear on what Citi will be doing. Cutting down on toxic assets in Citi Holdings and concentrating on CitiCorp's core businesses. Share prices plunged to $3.50+ range and luckily, Bank Of America was attracting more attention with Merrill Lynch's massive loss.

A quote from the article:

"The other denizens of Citi Holdings are to include various consumer businesses that Pandit has never shown interest in retaining, such as insurer Primerica. Press reports have said that Primerica will be sold, but it's basically been on the market for a year and hasn't moved. Another loss-ridden company, American International Group (AIG, Fortune 500), is trying to sell a large number of insurance companies and, in today's credit environment, they are stuck right where they are, on AIG's balance sheet.
Citi Holdings is also to inherit the $300 billion of toxic assets on which the U.S. government is sharing losses. That's a package that Pandit will surely be thrilled to shed management responsibility for."

There's good and bad on this spilt in my opinion. Good thing is, Citi will have a very clear company goal on what they want to achieve, reason being the core concentration is in CitiCorp, with core businesses like credit cards, wealth management, the corporate bank and the investment bank.

Bad news is, whoever lands in Citi Holdings, you are more or less prepared to be sold off or laid off. When you separate your non important businesses away, more likely you won't want to keep it as it is more of an expense than a profit making unit. Especially during such bad times, such expenses should be kept as low as possible.

Another article on Citi:
<http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/18/news/companies/anyone_run_citigroup.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009011616>

Citi and Morgan to merge brokerages

In the first step of an expected overhaul of Citigroup by Vikram Pandit, the bruised bank agreed to sell 51% of Smith Barney to John Mack's Morgan Stanley.

<http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/13/news/companies/citigroup/index.htm?postversion=2009011319>

In a nutshell, we could probably see more of Citi's breakout of its various units if it is still unable to turn itself out within the year. Share prices isn't reflecting well on the bank and in my opinion, the CEO hasn't really done much for the past 1 year plus since he took over and investors is still isn't convinced that the bank can survive its universal business model with high capital ratio and government support.

My take, if the Smith Barney unit isn't good, why will Morgan Stanley buy it? In such bad times, only good things get sold and for a discounted price. This simply doesn't benefit Citi in any way and one must take note of how the media actually wrote that it benefits both parties. It only benefits Citi because Citi needs the capital, and not making a good deal out of this. I wonder if Citi sells of its Card unit and Consumer banking unit, will it still be considered as a bank?

One good thing that I can think of which is coming out of this de-leveraging for Citi is they will have a very clear company goal after all the selling. The old Citi has literally everything, ranging from consumer banking, brokerage, investment, commerical banking, insurance, global wealth management and many more! Your business model can have alot, but what is the core of your business? I guess investors couldn't see this and thus the share price tumbling. Morever, I think there are shortists at work on this counter too, resulting in heavy fall.

Citi, Wells Fargo fights for wachovia

Sudden news of Wells Fargo taking over Wachovia instead shocked investors quite a fair bit. We all thought that Citi already got the deal to take over with the help of FDIC, but things aren't turning out the way it was expected.

If they lose out on this takeover, this will be the outcome in US:



As far as it goes, Citi was the largest in terms of assets before the crisis and now, they are ranked 4th in terms of deposit. Anyway, their main stream was in capital markets, and not deposits. Comparing itself to the other 4 large commercial banks, it has to do something in order to stay competitive in the market.

Other news include the 700 billion bailout plan. It was finally approved with a few amendents and the main core of it was:
- protecting tax payers
- curbing executive payouts
- new accounting rules
- bank deposit caps are increased

Yen/USD is currently at 105.31-105.38 + 0.30, and nothing much else apart from markets still falling despite the bailout plan. One must consider this fact, it doesn't mean that the government approved the bailout plan and markets will turn better straight away. The credit crunch may still last a while, probably into next year to allow banks to get liquidity again to start lending again.
The logic is simple; just like when you fall and sprain your leg. The doctor can give u painkillers but it doesn't mean you can walk back as per normal immediately. Unfortunately, some traders take such weaknesses in the market and exploit to make capital gains and the market turmoil will not be easily curbed.
High chance is as long as the dust starts to settle down and good news are coming out from banks, it will probably be a good chance to start buying in strong companies.